ratedsolicitors.com Report : Visit Site

Technical data of the ratedsolicitors.com

Geo IP provides you such as latitude, longitude and ISP (Internet Service Provider) etc. informations. Our GeoIP service found where is host ratedsolicitors.com. Currently, hosted in United Kingdom and its service provider is 4D Data Centres Ltd .

HTTP Header Analysis

HTTP Header information is a part of HTTP protocol that a user's browser sends to called Apache containing the details of what the browser wants and will accept back from the web server.

DNS

HtmlToText

are you part of a firm? increase your audience, market and new business opportunities newsletter signup add a firm office login home blog news for solicitors for non-solicitors advertising the law guide searching for a solicitor? how will you find the right one for you? let's face it, most people don't instruct lawyers very often. the legal profession is a bit of a mystery to most of us. wouldn't it be great if there was a site where you could find solicitors, and see how others have rated them? and wouldn't it be even better if you could obtain quotes from different law practices, and get advice too? you're here. brings together a range of legal professionals, all of whom are happy to let their clients share their experiences. this is where you'll find the solicitor to suit you. latest reviews dreadful posted by: anonymous for: brethertons llp residential conveyancing i have worked with many solicitors on residential conveyancing transactions, but have never encountered the dreadful level of service and attitude of the individuals associated with this organisation. continually failed to respond when they said they would, documents full of errors, and an aggressive attitude attempting to trivialise their mistakes when asked for an explaination. don't be fooled by the replies from brethertons on this site. in my experience they have no interest in discussing or resolving issues. in fact they refuse to engage and discuss. avoid at all costs. my advice is avoid. the partners and directors of this firm (in particular debbie phillips and alison mccormack) should be ashamed of the operation they are in charge of. show more show less avoid. callous and unre posted by: paul kemmer for: chapman pieri solicitors avoid! i was dropped as a client days before a crucial hearing. i questioned the impartiality of my solicitor. this cost me thousands of pounds in fees and penalties. i was suffering mental health problems, but this seemed not to matter. there was no discussion, no process to appeal, just an overnight decision to drop me as a client. i have worked successfully with hundreds of lawyers in the 33 years of my professional life, but i have never experienced behaviour and ethics so callous and unprofessional. show more show less unprofessional posted by: anonymous for: turpin & miller llp unprofessional, rude, abrupt, arrogant and very despicable manner of approach. this firm uses case workers instead of actual lawyers to actually advice clients. a breach of trust and certainly unreliable team especially if you are given a person called julian stern. he is a so called senior immigration caseworker but has no interpersonal skills and is very reluctant to do any work. show more show less very poor at sending correct documents posted by: anonymous for: bolt burdon kemp 0n 27th march 2014, bbk instructed a lawyer to examine a claim for professional negligence against a barrister and to examine an underlying claim for illegal charges under a 2008 contract. the instructions to the barrister stated that documents attached included “terms and conditions” (undated). bolt, burdon, kemp had received the 2008 terms and conditions, and these were in the evidence bundle provided by the ombudsman. any person would conclude that it was necessary for the barrister to see the 2008 terms and conditions and to cry “foul” if they had not been attached. it is unclear whether they were sent or whether they were overlooked by the barrister but it is not relevant. liability would fall upon bolt burdon kemp with whom the customer had a contract. offering an opinion on a breach of contract without seeing it would be regarded as gross negligence, according to every source consulted. in july 2014 the customer collected from bolt burdon kemp the file of his case. that file did not include the instructions from bolt, burdon, kemp to the barrister. on 13th october 2015, the ombudsman wrote: “[the barrister] says that the validity of the 2008 terms, which she admits she did not see, had no bearing on her opinion as she says that the crucial terms she relied upon, which were relevant to the claim were those of the 2001 document ….” there is no indication of how the barrister could possibly offer a legal opinion on a breach of the 2008 terms and conditions without seeing them, but the ombudsman is a lay organisation. if the barrister had written that she used tarot cards, the ombudsman would not have challenged it. on or about 20th december 2016, the ombudsman provided to the customer the evidence bundle of all the documents which had been forwarded to them by bolt, burdon, kemp. that bundle did not include the instructions sent to the barrister. a representative of bolt burdon kemp, on 29th march 2019, wrote to the customer: “however for ease of reference, i enclose a further copy of these instructions which clearly show that the terms and conditions … were provided to the barrister … together with full copies of all documentation provided by you in your original action.” this was the first time the customer had seen these. there is no evidence whatsoever that the 2008 terms and conditions were in the bundle which was sent to the barrister. on the contrary there is evidence of “suppression” of these instructions until 2019, and failure to send relevant documents to the ombudsman. both of these fall into the realm of the criminal and are being referred to the solicitor regulatory authority and/or the police. the ombudsman originally investigated the complaint against the firm bbk, and decided that there were grounds for reporting their behaviour to the sra: the ombudsman wrote: i am dealing with, or have dealt with, a complaint involving the above named authorised legal professional under the ombudsman scheme set out in part 6 of the legal services act 2007. i am of the opinion that their conduct should be reported to the authorising body to consider whether it wishes to take action against them. possible misconduct under s.143 of the lsa 2007 instructed to give view on the prospects of success of litigation against former barrister. when new barrister was asked for her view the advice was negative and the firm advised that they could not act under cfa. mr lamford threatened to “sue” both the firm and the barrister in an email and the solicitor forwarded this email to the barrister concerned without authority. show more show less save your time and money posted by: anonymous for: hopkins law limited not much to say as it still annoys me now.. do not waste your time or money. you’re better off dealing with things yourself as the solicitor that “helped” me was like a jet pack - non existent! lucky to have her speak to you let alone go to a mediation session or court hearing! must not be bothered or had better things to do because she didn’t turn up for any hearings with me, just sent some clown instead. show more show less -- latest blogs -- -- -- -- -- read more -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- no blog items -- there are no news items added at this time. -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- latest news -- -- -- -- -- read more -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- no blog items -- there are no news items added at this time. -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- latest blogs read more no blog items there are no news items added at this time. -- latest questions read more no questions no questions have been added at this time. -- top rated firms sharp family law head office 25 reviews more info ardens solicitors head office 21 reviews more info morris legal (solicitors) ltd premium 12 reviews head office central boulevard, west midlands t: 0121 711 1511 more info fbc manby bowdler llp premium 11 reviews head office george house, west midlands t: 01902 578000 more info blacks solicitors llp premium 11 reviews head office hanover house, west yorkshire t: 0113 207 0000 more info about us contact us blog news for non-solicitors find a solicitor rate a solicitor ask a solicitor quote from a solicitor advertising the law g

URL analysis for ratedsolicitors.com

http://www.ratedsolicitors.com///ask-a-solicitor/
http://www.ratedsolicitors.com///solicitor/ardens-solicitors/
http://www.ratedsolicitors.com///contact/
http://www.ratedsolicitors.com///signup/
http://www.ratedsolicitors.com///solicitor/bolt-burdon-kemp
http://www.ratedsolicitors.com///login/
http://www.ratedsolicitors.com///solicitor/blacks-solicitors-llp/
http://www.ratedsolicitors.com///terms/
http://www.ratedsolicitors.com///newsletter/
http://www.ratedsolicitors.com///for-solicitors/
http://www.ratedsolicitors.com///quote-from-a-solicitor/
http://www.ratedsolicitors.com///solicitor/turpin-miller-llp
http://www.ratedsolicitors.com///solicitor/hopkins-law-limited-6374
http://www.ratedsolicitors.com///find-a-solicitor/
http://www.ratedsolicitors.com///for-non-solicitors/

Whois Information

Whois is a protocol that is access to registering information. You can reach when the website was registered, when it will be expire, what is contact details of the site with the following informations. In a nutshell, it includes these informations;

Domain Name: RATEDSOLICITORS.COM
Registry Domain ID: 1698475254_DOMAIN_COM-VRSN
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.123-reg.co.uk
Registrar URL: http://www.meshdigital.com
Updated Date: 2016-01-17T06:24:21Z
Creation Date: 2012-01-24T13:50:22Z
Registry Expiry Date: 2018-01-24T13:50:22Z
Registrar: 123-Reg Limited
Registrar IANA ID: 1515
Registrar Abuse Contact Email:
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone:
Domain Status: ok https://icann.org/epp#ok
Name Server: NS1.HEXICA.NET
Name Server: NS2.HEXICA.NET
DNSSEC: unsigned
URL of the ICANN Whois Inaccuracy Complaint Form: https://www.icann.org/wicf/
>>> Last update of whois database: 2017-09-05T14:59:42Z <<<

For more information on Whois status codes, please visit https://icann.org/epp

NOTICE: The expiration date displayed in this record is the date the
registrar's sponsorship of the domain name registration in the registry is
currently set to expire. This date does not necessarily reflect the expiration
date of the domain name registrant's agreement with the sponsoring
registrar. Users may consult the sponsoring registrar's Whois database to
view the registrar's reported date of expiration for this registration.

TERMS OF USE: You are not authorized to access or query our Whois
database through the use of electronic processes that are high-volume and
automated except as reasonably necessary to register domain names or
modify existing registrations; the Data in VeriSign Global Registry
Services' ("VeriSign") Whois database is provided by VeriSign for
information purposes only, and to assist persons in obtaining information
about or related to a domain name registration record. VeriSign does not
guarantee its accuracy. By submitting a Whois query, you agree to abide
by the following terms of use: You agree that you may use this Data only
for lawful purposes and that under no circumstances will you use this Data
to: (1) allow, enable, or otherwise support the transmission of mass
unsolicited, commercial advertising or solicitations via e-mail, telephone,
or facsimile; or (2) enable high volume, automated, electronic processes
that apply to VeriSign (or its computer systems). The compilation,
repackaging, dissemination or other use of this Data is expressly
prohibited without the prior written consent of VeriSign. You agree not to
use electronic processes that are automated and high-volume to access or
query the Whois database except as reasonably necessary to register
domain names or modify existing registrations. VeriSign reserves the right
to restrict your access to the Whois database in its sole discretion to ensure
operational stability. VeriSign may restrict or terminate your access to the
Whois database for failure to abide by these terms of use. VeriSign
reserves the right to modify these terms at any time.

The Registry database contains ONLY .COM, .NET, .EDU domains and
Registrars.

  REGISTRAR 123-Reg Limited

SERVERS

  SERVER com.whois-servers.net

  ARGS domain =ratedsolicitors.com

  PORT 43

  TYPE domain

DOMAIN

  NAME ratedsolicitors.com

  CHANGED 2016-01-17

  CREATED 2012-01-24

STATUS
ok https://icann.org/epp#ok

NSERVER

  NS1.HEXICA.NET 178.17.33.206

  NS2.HEXICA.NET 178.17.33.214

  REGISTERED yes

Mistakes

The following list shows you to spelling mistakes possible of the internet users for the website searched .